The portfolio process,
done properly.
Audits, QIPs and systematic reviews are how you compete for training — and a scramble of spreadsheets, half-remembered stats and guideline PDFs at 11pm. Regspire walks you through each one the right way, and produces work that stands up to scrutiny.
Free during the beta · Built by a UK doctor, for UK trainees
Three complete workflows. One place.
Each one takes you from a blank page to a finished, defensible project — with the reasoning shown at every stage, so you learn the method while you use it.
Clinical audit
Turn a care standard into measurable criteria grounded in real guidelines, collect data in an auto-built table, analyse compliance, then close the loop with an action plan, a re-audit and a full both-cycles report. It won't let you claim an improvement your numbers don't actually support.
Quality improvement projects
Set your aim and your outcome, process and balancing measures, track change on a run chart that tells a real signal from random noise, run PDSA cycles, and produce a SQUIRE-structured report and poster. The baseline locks before you see the data — so the result can't be nudged after the fact.
Systematic reviews & meta-analysis
Shape and feasibility-check your question, build the search, screen with an AI second reader, appraise risk of bias, pool a genuine meta-analysis, rate certainty with GRADE, and write it up. The stats run on the same standard software peer-reviewed reviews use — and you can re-run any result yourself.
How do you know the numbers are right?
It's the most important question for a clinical tool — so here's the plain answer, including what's still in progress.
Published methods, not home-brew
Confidence intervals, run-chart rules and meta-analysis all use established, peer-reviewed methods — and the meta-analysis uses the same standard software academic papers rely on.
It shows its working
Every number traces back to its inputs, so you can reproduce any result independently rather than taking it on faith. Nothing is a black box.
Validated against known results
The engine is being checked by reproducing the published results of landmark reviews — the same idea as calibrating an instrument. In progress, and claimed only as the evidence lands.
Built for every stage of UK training.
- — Medical students building a portfolio before applications open
- — Foundation doctors racing to evidence audit, QIP and research
- — Core and specialty trainees who need work that holds up at ARCP
- — Anyone doing improvement work in the NHS who wants it done properly
“Applying for my first job as a doctor filled me with equal parts excitement and dread — the deadlines and the sheer amount to get done get a bit overwhelming.”
Be first in when it opens.
We're opening Regspire to a small group of UK trainees this autumn. Add your email and we'll invite you in — and tell you the moment new pillars go live.
No spam, ever. Just your invite and the occasional update.